Bartosz Wolski.

The decision on Bartosz Wolski in three parts: which squads the numbers argue for, what profiles like his have cost, and what the file cannot vouch for.

1. Fit, ranked

8 clubs were scored on level, squad need and feasibility. NK Istra 1961 is ranked first for fit: MF group is 6 deep against a league median of 9, 3 contracts up by Jun 2027. The engine reads him as a lateral-plus (Level 590 against a cohort average of 456). A rank is a statement about fit, not a forecast: the engine does not say where he goes, only which squads the numbers argue for.

2. Price context

His recorded market value sits above the band's ceiling by €425k: the listed value asks more than comparable transfers actually fetched.

3. Risk flags

Higher-Level players have sold for higher fees: rank correlation +0.24 across 1257 sales abroad with a disclosed fee. The Level is a modest guide to playing time after a move: 39% of top-quartile players got at least 15 full matches of league football in a season at their new club, against 28% from the bottom quartile. Nothing on this page predicts who moves or who succeeds after moving. The fit ranking states which squads the numbers argue for; the price band states what comparable transfers fetched; the flags state what the file cannot vouch for.

1 completed outgoing move on record across 2026: 1 permanent, 0 loans, 0 permanent moves abroad.

Market value is the Transfermarkt estimate at the time of the move, not a fee. “not recorded” means the source holds no figure - it never means zero.

Season data places him at GKS Katowice in the Ekstraklasa as of 26/27.

The Latent Level is one number comparable across our seven leagues: a performance composite, adjusted for opponent strength within the league and for the league's own strength - calibrated on how players from each league actually fared after moving, not on reputation. It is an index on a 0 to 1,000 scale, not a percentile or a percentage, and cohort averages differ by competition - so it is only readable next to the positional average printed beside it.

His Level of 672 is well above the average for an Ekstraklasa midfielder. That average is drawn from 177 midfielders who played at least 270 minutes in the Ekstraklasa in the 2025/26 season.

Every percentile below ranks Bartosz Wolski within the group of 177 midfielders who played at least 270 minutes in the Ekstraklasa in the 2025/26 season - his last complete season with a sample big enough to rank. He is compared only with players from his own league, season and position, never across leagues or divisions.

3 seasons carry a Level. From EKS 24/25 to EKS 26/27 the rating moved -18 (down). Each season is read against its own positional average, printed beside it, because the average differs by competition.

Each checkpoint rescores his season-to-date per-90s at the end of that month against the full-season cohort of players in his position and competition, with opponent adjustment and the continental factor held at their season values, so the last checkpoint equals his published Level.

His own record holds no permanent move abroad yet. Fees paid for him so far: €100k to GKS Katowice.

Each card's cost line is what completed moves on that route have gone for - it prices the route, not the player. The recommended range for Bartosz Wolski himself is €98k–€375k, from his closest comparable transfers (Valuation & comps). Where a route's band sits above it, that is the destination market's price level, not a higher valuation of him.

Bartosz Wolski is a Possession midfielder. Below: his nearest statistical neighbours side by side, then the ones who earned a move and what it cost.

How Bartosz Wolski is trending match by match in the EKS 25/26 - not the season average, but the direction of travel. Each reading is his trailing 10 appearances, a window wide enough to smooth one-game noise while still moving when his level does, with every match weighed by opposition difficulty.

This log covers his 25/26 season at Motor Lublin - before his move to GKS Katowice, whose fixtures can therefore appear here as opposition.

Trailing rate over the last 10 appearances, every match weighed by opposition difficulty. A gap in a line means the window fell below the minutes gate for that stat - withheld rather than invented, never zero.

Opposition difficulty is the opponent's points-per-match from our own finished results, 1.0 = league average - a per-match weight, never a league table; “—” = under 5 matches played. Showing the 14 most recent of 34 appearances.

Bartosz Wolski has no UEFA club-competition appearance in our continental package (2018–2026 group stages onward and qualifying where covered).

That absence is informative in itself: any projection to export-level opposition rests on league data alone, and the rest of this report treats it that way.

What Bartosz Wolski should cost, grounded in what comparable players actually cost. His market value is set against a performance model built on his own age and position group (n=3,810); the range below comes from 30 comparable transfers with recorded fees, not from optimism.

Comps are completed transfers scored for closeness on age at the move, position, minutes load, output, the level of both leagues and recency; fees are as recorded, never asking prices. The recommended range is set by the closest matches, not the full spread plotted above: read it as what the market has recently paid for this profile. Method: comps v2.0 (2026-08-15).

Every number in this report is computed from sources we name, under rules we publish, with its gaps stated. What follows is the full list of methods and limits - including the things this report deliberately does not claim.

Sources: SofaScore (per-match), Transfermarkt (market & transfers). Generated 2026-09-21. Questions about any figure in this report are welcome - every one is reproducible from the stated method.